The Legal Definition Under the Saudi TP Bylaws
The arm’s length principle is defined in Article 1 of the Saudi TP Bylaws (March 2023): where conditions between related parties differ from those which would exist between independent parties, the profits that would otherwise have accrued may be included in the tax or Zakat base and taxed accordingly.
This is not simply a pricing standard — it is a profit allocation standard. The question is not only whether your transfer price looks reasonable, but whether the profit outcome for the Saudi entity reflects the functions it performs, the assets it employs, and the risks it bears.
Article 3 frames it operationally: a controlled transaction is at arm’s length if its terms are materially similar to the terms of a comparable transaction between independent persons.
The Five Comparability Factors
Under Article 5 of the Bylaws, comparability is assessed across five factors to the extent they are economically relevant:
| # | Factor | Key Elements |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Characteristics of property / services | For goods: quality, volume. For services: nature, scope, benefit. For IP: form, protection, expected benefits. |
| 2 | Functional analysis | Functions performed (design, manufacturing, R&D, distribution); assets used (fixed assets, IP, financial); risks assumed (market, credit, currency, R&D) |
| 3 | Contractual terms | Pricing mechanism, payment terms, risk allocation, duration, conditions |
| 4 | Economic circumstances | Geographic market, competitive environment, regulatory conditions, market-level profitability |
| 5 | Business strategies | Market penetration, product launches, cost-cutting — must be genuine, time-limited, commercially rational |
The Functional Analysis: The Most Consequential Factor
The functional analysis is the cornerstone of any TP analysis. It identifies what the Saudi entity actually does (functions), what it owns and uses (assets), and what it stands to gain or lose (risks). These three elements together determine the entity’s functional characterisation — and therefore what arm’s length return it should earn.
Under the OECD’s DEMPE framework (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, Exploitation), adopted as an interpretive reference in the June 2024 ZATCA Guidelines, the entity that controls and funds the risk — not merely the one that contractually bears it — is entitled to the corresponding return.
A Saudi entity contractually characterised as a limited-risk entity that actually performs strategic functions and controls material risks may have its characterisation re-examined by ZATCA. The substance of the arrangement, not the label, governs.
Applying the Arm’s Length Standard: Step-by-Step
Step 1 — Delineate the transaction. Understand what the transaction actually is, based on substance — not its contractual label. A “management fee” can represent genuine high-value strategic advice, routine administrative support, or a disguised dividend. Each has a different arm’s length treatment.
Step 2 — Select the most appropriate TP method. Based on the functional profile and the nature of the transaction, select the method providing the most reliable arm’s length measure. Document why the chosen method is more appropriate than the alternatives.
Step 3 — Identify potential comparables. Domestic comparables are preferred where available. Foreign comparables are acceptable where domestic ones are not available, provided consistency with comparability requirements is demonstrated and geographic differences are addressed.
Step 4 — Apply comparability adjustments. Eliminate the effects of material differences between controlled and uncontrolled transactions. The June 2024 Guidelines confirm the interquartile range as the standard statistical approach to the arm’s length range.
Worked Example: SAR 5 Million Management Fee
Al-Buraida Services Co. — Management Fee Analysis
Al-Buraida Services Co. is a Jeddah-based entity, 100% owned by a Singapore holding company, providing back-office services to third parties. The Singapore parent charges Al-Buraida SAR 5 million per year for “strategic advisory, group IT systems access, treasury support, and HR policy development.”
Al-Buraida’s total annual revenue: SAR 35 million. The fee equals 14% of revenue.
Benefit test: What specific services are actually being provided? A service log, time records, or evidence of deliverables is required. If Al-Buraida’s management handles day-to-day operations independently, and Singapore’s involvement is limited to standardised group policies, the “benefit” is limited. Shareholder activities (group-level oversight, parent-level governance) do not pass the benefit test.
Pricing test: A Cost Plus analysis of Singapore’s costs attributable to Al-Buraida: 50 staff-hours per month × SAR 600/hour fully-loaded = SAR 4.32 million per year before mark-up. At a 10% mark-up, the arm’s length fee ≈ SAR 4.75 million.
A TNMM benchmarking study of comparable management consulting firms produces an operating margin range of 8%–18%, giving an arm’s length fee range of SAR 3.0M–SAR 5.1M at the tested cost base. SAR 5 million falls within the range.
Cross-regime implication: The SAR 5 million fee paid to the Singapore parent is subject to 5% WHT in Saudi Arabia (subject to applicable treaty relief). If ZATCA determines only part of the fee reflects a genuine, arm’s length service, the WHT exposure on the non-deductible portion becomes a separate adjustment risk.
Common Errors in Arm’s Length Analysis
- Relying on the contract rather than the conduct. ZATCA examines whether actual commercial conduct is consistent with the contract. A gap between form and substance is a significant red flag.
- Benchmarking the wrong entity. In TNMM, the tested party should be the least complex entity with the most reliable comparables. Selecting the wrong tested party undermines the analysis.
- Using outdated benchmarks. A study from 2020 may not reflect current market conditions. Benchmark data more than three years old in a significantly changed market carries documentation risk.
- Not adjusting for Saudi market conditions. Applying European or Asian margins to a Saudi entity without geographic adjustments is methodologically weak.
Frequently Asked Questions
- The arm’s length principle is a profit allocation test, not just a pricing test. The question ZATCA asks: given what this Saudi entity actually does, owns, and risks — is the profit outcome consistent with what an independent party would have earned?
- The functional analysis is the most consequential comparability factor. Risk allocation must be economically real, not just contractual.
- A structured comparability analysis across the five Article 5 factors, documented contemporaneously, is the foundation of a defensible TP position.
Also worth reading
This article reflects the Saudi Transfer Pricing Bylaws (March 2023 version) and the ZATCA Transfer Pricing Guidelines (June 2024 edition). It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Readers should confirm the current position with ZATCA guidance or a qualified Saudi TP advisor. dariba.co is an independent platform with no consulting relationships.
Leave a Reply