In brief
Identify the VAT supplier in disclosed agency, own-name and resale arrangements, with official examples, full supply values and invoice responsibilities.
An agency label does not decide who supplies goods or services for Saudi VAT. A business may be a commercial agent, a disclosed representative or a person contracting in its own name. Those arrangements can produce different suppliers, invoice identities, VAT bases and input-tax claims, even where the goods move directly from the original seller to the final customer.
VAT Law Article 9 provides the rule for a taxable person acting in its own name on another person’s behalf. ZATCA’s Guideline for Agents under VAT Provisions, second version May 2026, sections 4–6, explains how to distinguish that case from disclosed agency and ordinary purchase/resale.
Determine the role for the actual transaction
Guideline section 4.1 describes an agency relationship involving authority to act for a principal and create legal obligations binding on that principal. Section 4.2 examines the contracts, commercial relationship and actual circumstances. The same business can be an agent for one transaction and principal for another.
Relevant indicators include whose name appears in the customer contract, the authority granted, whose instructions govern, who controls the price and terms, entitlement to the goods or services, and commercial risks. The guideline presents these as characteristics requiring evaluation, rather than one universal tick-box test.
Dariba analysis: neither the word commission nor the absence of physical possession settles the outcome. A person buying and reselling goods can arrange direct delivery to its customer; an agent can collect the customer’s money without making the underlying supply itself.
Separate commercial-agency status from VAT status
Section 4.1.1 distinguishes the Commercial Agencies Law’s scope from the VAT analysis. A distributor or franchisee described as a commercial agent can contract on its own account as the buyer and onward supplier. Conversely, an agent representing a Saudi resident may meet the VAT agency concept without the arrangement being the same type of foreign commercial agency.
Official Example 2, section 4.1: the Saudi automotive group purchases and imports vehicles from a European manufacturer, then sells them directly to Saudi customers. Despite the commercial agency description, it acts as principal for those supplies.
Dariba recommendation: review the purchase and sale obligations rather than transplanting a commercial licence description into the VAT return. Identify the contractual recipient on each leg and the actual onward supply.
Apply the disclosed-agent model to the main supply and agency fee
Sections 5.1–5.2 describe a disclosed agent acting in the principal’s name. The main supply runs directly from the seller to the final customer. The agent separately supplies its agency service to the principal, which may be the seller or buyer represented.
Official Example 1, section 4.1: Al Saqr sells equipment worth SAR 250,000 to Maritime, while Al Dammam Technical facilitates the transaction for a SAR 5,000 commission. The manufacturer and customer conclude the main contract. The equipment supply and the agent’s service are different supplies with different suppliers and customers.
Official Example 4, section 5.2: consulting services of SAR 16,000 carry SAR 2,400 VAT, while a separate 10% referral commission of SAR 1,600 carries SAR 240 VAT. The agent’s fee is not part of its own onward sale of the underlying consultancy on those disclosed-agency facts.
Delivering goods, collecting the principal’s payment or issuing a permitted invoice on its behalf does not alone change that disclosed relationship. Reconcile the collected money and commission separately rather than treating every bank receipt as the agent’s own sales revenue.
Apply Article 9 where the agent contracts in its own name
Article 9 treats a taxable person supplying or receiving goods or services in its own name on another person’s behalf as supplying or receiving them itself. Guideline sections 6.1–6.2 therefore identify a supply to the agent and an onward supply from the agent to the final customer.
Official Example 6: the distributor sells computer devices without disclosing the manufacturer as principal, follows a fixed selling price and remits proceeds after a 5% commission. Those pricing and remittance conditions do not prevent the distributor from acting in its own name for VAT.
Official Example 7 similarly describes a vehicle-leasing intermediary acting in its own name while the undisclosed principal retains ownership of the cars. Legal title to the underlying asset is therefore not, by itself, a complete answer to the Article 9 supply-chain question.
Dariba recommendation: map both VAT legs before preparing the invoices. Determine who supplied to the agent, who received the onward supply, the consideration for each leg and the applicable tax treatment. Do not declare only a retained commission where Article 9 requires recognition of the onward supply.
Use the full supply values and assess each leg separately
Official Example 3, section 4.3: a wholesaler purchases goods for SAR 60,000 plus SAR 9,000 VAT and sells them for SAR 70,000 plus SAR 10,500 VAT. The manufacturer delivers directly to the retailer, but there are still two supplies.
Dariba calculation from the official figures: if those are the wholesaler’s only relevant transactions and the SAR 9,000 input tax is fully deductible, the net VAT difference is SAR 1,500. That does not mean its output invoice or declared sales value is merely the SAR 10,000 commercial spread. The actual sale carries SAR 10,500 output tax.
Section 6.3 also requires separate treatment of each supply. A domestic purchase and a qualifying onward export can have different rates. Do not assume that two supplies of the same goods must always carry identical VAT or that export relief follows merely because the final principal is abroad.
Use the goods-export guide for the actual conditions and evidence, and the imported-goods guide where the intermediary is also involved in importation.
Distinguish an embedded margin from a genuinely separate service
Section 6.3 explains that own-name agency remuneration commonly appears in the difference between the purchase and onward supply values. It is not normally a second agency service added to the same amount. Distinct services can nevertheless exist.
Official Example 9: White Book contracts in its own name and retains a 15% commission from product-sale proceeds. It also receives a fixed SAR 10,000 monthly fee for separate services regardless of whether sales occur. The guide treats that fixed fee as consideration for a distinct service.
Dariba analysis: identify what the separate fee buys. Avoid both omitting a real independent service and charging VAT twice on one embedded remuneration amount because the accounting system calls the margin a commission. A contractual fee name should be reconciled to the supplies actually made.
Agency services to a Saudi-resident principal are generally standard-rated under section 5.2, even where the main supply is exempt or zero-rated. Services to a foreign principal require the separate Article 33 analysis explained in the exported-services guide; a foreign billing address alone is insufficient.
Align invoice identity, input tax and responsibility
For a disclosed agency, the principal remains the main supplier responsible for output tax and its invoice. Regulations Article 53(3) permits third-party invoicing subject to the required approval and conditions; it does not transfer the principal’s responsibility for accuracy and declaring the tax. Guideline section 11.1.1 addresses supplier identification, the prior arrangement and notification, and prevention of duplicate invoices.
An invoice issued on the principal’s behalf must identify the actual supplier in that capacity. This is different from an own-name agent issuing its own invoice for its onward supply. The invoice guide explains the related requirements.
Guideline section 10.1.1 distinguishes input tax on supplies received by an own-name agent from costs incurred in the principal’s name. Deduction still depends on the applicable taxable-use, restriction and evidence conditions. Paying another person’s invoice does not itself give the paying agent an input-tax entitlement.
The disbursements and cost-recharges guide applies this to expenses. Retain the actual agreements, instructions, customer-facing contracts, invoices, settlements and reconciliations. The useful conclusion identifies each party’s supply and responsibility before calculating the VAT.
Key takeaways
- Commercial-agency status does not decide the VAT role.
- The role must be assessed for the particular transaction.
- A disclosed agent’s fee differs from the principal’s main supply.
- Own-name dealings create a purchase and onward-supply analysis.
- A net VAT difference is not the output invoice value.
- Supplier identity and input entitlement must match the actual supplies.
Sources
- Saudi VAT Law, current Arabic textArticle 9: supplies or receipts by a taxable person in its own name on another person’s behalf.
- VAT Implementing Regulations, current amended Arabic textArticles 49–51: input entitlement, evidence, restrictions and allocation; Article 53(3): third-party invoicing and continuing supplier responsibility.
- ZATCA Guideline for Agents under VAT Provisions, second version May 2026Sections 4–8, 10 and 11.1.1: roles, disclosed/own-name chains, separate services, disbursements/recharges, input entitlement and invoicing. Actual section/example references are identified in the analysis.
General information only. Actual supplies, facts, applicable periods and controlling Arabic legislation determine the result. Official examples are distinguished from Dariba analysis and original illustrations. Seek advice or clarification where the arrangement or source material leaves a specific issue unresolved.


